<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone 4 vs iPhone 3GS: A comparison of features normal users care about</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geekshuiliving.com/2010/06/25/iphone-4-vs-iphone-3gs-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geekshuiliving.com/2010/06/25/iphone-4-vs-iphone-3gs-comparison/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 08:55:12 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Athtart</title>
		<link>http://geekshuiliving.com/2010/06/25/iphone-4-vs-iphone-3gs-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-1631</link>
		<dc:creator>Athtart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekshuiliving.com/?p=3619#comment-1631</guid>
		<description>FYI iPhone 3gs photos are 3mp and are much larger than 800 x 600... actually they are 2048×1536. They only get downsized when you use the &quot;share&quot; function. Just to be clear, which the article was not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI iPhone 3gs photos are 3mp and are much larger than 800 x 600&#8230; actually they are 2048×1536. They only get downsized when you use the &#8220;share&#8221; function. Just to be clear, which the article was not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Designer</title>
		<link>http://geekshuiliving.com/2010/06/25/iphone-4-vs-iphone-3gs-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-1591</link>
		<dc:creator>Designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekshuiliving.com/?p=3619#comment-1591</guid>
		<description>The sharp edges are awful to tuch!
BIG MISTAKE! I love iphone so i will stick to 3GS..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sharp edges are awful to tuch!<br />
BIG MISTAKE! I love iphone so i will stick to 3GS..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryuzaki</title>
		<link>http://geekshuiliving.com/2010/06/25/iphone-4-vs-iphone-3gs-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-1203</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryuzaki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 03:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekshuiliving.com/?p=3619#comment-1203</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see that much of a difference though, performance wise, yeah there is but features wise, they are pretty much the same. I-3GS has the same things but not as good quality. But that hardly makes up for it&#039;s probably only competitor.

I own a 3GS but it seems like these phones are barely able to keep up with the Motorola Droid. I don&#039;t know how long I&#039;ll be an Apple Phone customer...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see that much of a difference though, performance wise, yeah there is but features wise, they are pretty much the same. I-3GS has the same things but not as good quality. But that hardly makes up for it&#8217;s probably only competitor.</p>
<p>I own a 3GS but it seems like these phones are barely able to keep up with the Motorola Droid. I don&#8217;t know how long I&#8217;ll be an Apple Phone customer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MutableParadox</title>
		<link>http://geekshuiliving.com/2010/06/25/iphone-4-vs-iphone-3gs-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-1194</link>
		<dc:creator>MutableParadox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekshuiliving.com/?p=3619#comment-1194</guid>
		<description>As far as bit rate goes. It is bits per second which is referring to the amount of information contained in the video. That isn&#039;t an extreme difference and I would say is probably caused by the different encoding software. The compression algorithm could be slightly different. Either way it the higher the bit rate the more information encoded in the file. This normally means better quality, but obviously not always ^_~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as bit rate goes. It is bits per second which is referring to the amount of information contained in the video. That isn&#8217;t an extreme difference and I would say is probably caused by the different encoding software. The compression algorithm could be slightly different. Either way it the higher the bit rate the more information encoded in the file. This normally means better quality, but obviously not always ^_~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

